<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S.O.S., Different Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/</link>
	<description>Race, Politics, Gender, Sexuality, Anger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nott</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9057</link>
		<dc:creator>Nott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9057</guid>
		<description>I never thought that way about corsets. : /

Lame comment, I know. As always, you&#039;ve got an interesting blog. Thanks :]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought that way about corsets. : /</p>
<p>Lame comment, I know. As always, you&#8217;ve got an interesting blog. Thanks :]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Nathan</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9056</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9056</guid>
		<description>The Times article had some grievous journalism problems: mischaracterizations, serious errors, placing the piece in the News section in the first place when there was no news. See this:

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/01/12/side-effects-complications-the-new-york-times-diy-abortions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Times article had some grievous journalism problems: mischaracterizations, serious errors, placing the piece in the News section in the first place when there was no news. See this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/01/12/side-effects-complications-the-new-york-times-diy-abortions" rel="nofollow">http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/01/12/side-effects-complications-the-new-york-times-diy-abortions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asada</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9055</link>
		<dc:creator>Asada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9055</guid>
		<description>&quot;que lastima&quot;,
shun birth control, abhor abortions, but expect women to be sexy.

IT&#039;s seems few women have mastered the art of being sexy while not having sex.

I sympathize with young girls who get pregnant and have no where to go. I can&#039;t understand how we allow teenagers to carry babies to full term. I think its nutz. Why not have honest sex ed?  I and my friends had honest sex ed and we are not parents.

I grew up in a culture that also shunned abortions ( many girls leaving church for about a year coming back with a baby) and  birth control ( Sunday message-girls have sex because they are lonely , not horny, so love them and teach them to avoid sex!).

Maybe it was a combination of proper sex ed, religious influences, sheltering parents,  a desire not to derail my life- but I&#039;m 22 and not pregnant.  I&#039;m a virgin who has amassed over 50 condoms ( from health fairs, GLBT parades, and college &quot;sexperts&quot; presentations) and I give most of them away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;que lastima&#8221;,<br />
shun birth control, abhor abortions, but expect women to be sexy.</p>
<p>IT&#8217;s seems few women have mastered the art of being sexy while not having sex.</p>
<p>I sympathize with young girls who get pregnant and have no where to go. I can&#8217;t understand how we allow teenagers to carry babies to full term. I think its nutz. Why not have honest sex ed?  I and my friends had honest sex ed and we are not parents.</p>
<p>I grew up in a culture that also shunned abortions ( many girls leaving church for about a year coming back with a baby) and  birth control ( Sunday message-girls have sex because they are lonely , not horny, so love them and teach them to avoid sex!).</p>
<p>Maybe it was a combination of proper sex ed, religious influences, sheltering parents,  a desire not to derail my life- but I&#8217;m 22 and not pregnant.  I&#8217;m a virgin who has amassed over 50 condoms ( from health fairs, GLBT parades, and college &#8220;sexperts&#8221; presentations) and I give most of them away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diatryma</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9054</link>
		<dc:creator>Diatryma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9054</guid>
		<description>I have usually seen &#039;sexism&#039; to mean &#039;women are less than normal&#039; and &#039;machismo/macho&#039; to mean &#039;manly man! Manly man of awesome manliness!&#039;  The first tears down one sex/gender, the second builds the other up.  Macho/machismo doesn&#039;t have anything to do with women.  It is all about the manly men and their manliness.

This is only how I&#039;ve seen it used, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have usually seen &#8216;sexism&#8217; to mean &#8216;women are less than normal&#8217; and &#8216;machismo/macho&#8217; to mean &#8216;manly man! Manly man of awesome manliness!&#8217;  The first tears down one sex/gender, the second builds the other up.  Macho/machismo doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with women.  It is all about the manly men and their manliness.</p>
<p>This is only how I&#8217;ve seen it used, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienne</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9053</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9053</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I get the impression that English has two synonyms to refer to sex discrimination: “sexism” is universal and “machismo” is what Latinos and sometimes Mediterranean people (ie Italians) do. I don’t know if that’s the actual use but I find it extremely racist, as if it was implying that “Hispanic and Mediterranean people are so sexist that they need a special word all for them”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d tend to agree with this (and I&#039;m white, and English is my first language). I understand what Duncan is saying, but my experience with the word has been closer to what Nia said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I get the impression that English has two synonyms to refer to sex discrimination: “sexism” is universal and “machismo” is what Latinos and sometimes Mediterranean people (ie Italians) do. I don’t know if that’s the actual use but I find it extremely racist, as if it was implying that “Hispanic and Mediterranean people are so sexist that they need a special word all for them”.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d tend to agree with this (and I&#8217;m white, and English is my first language). I understand what Duncan is saying, but my experience with the word has been closer to what Nia said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9052</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9052</guid>
		<description>Nia, &quot;machismo&quot; and &quot;macho&quot; became a buzzword in American English in the early 1970s as I recall, but it was applied to *American* men.  A lot of the gabachos who used the term didn&#039;t even know how to pronounce it (I often heard it said as if it were spelled mako), or thought that &quot;machismo&quot; was an adjective, or thought that &quot;macho&quot; meant &quot;machismo.&quot;  (See, for example, Michele Wallace&#039;s book &quot;Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman,&quot; first published around 1979.)

Further, &quot;machismo&quot; is not a synonym for &quot;sexism.&quot;  I&#039;m not so sure of all of its connotations in Spanish - I&#039;m just now becoming confident enough of my Spanish to begin looking at the literature in that language -- but in English it refers to a particular style of aggressive, impenetrable masculinity.  This style is commonly associated with Latin men, but as I said, we find it in enough gabachos that American English took &quot;machismo&quot; as a loan word and applied to American men as well.  So I&#039;m afraid your impression is mistaken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nia, &#8220;machismo&#8221; and &#8220;macho&#8221; became a buzzword in American English in the early 1970s as I recall, but it was applied to *American* men.  A lot of the gabachos who used the term didn&#8217;t even know how to pronounce it (I often heard it said as if it were spelled mako), or thought that &#8220;machismo&#8221; was an adjective, or thought that &#8220;macho&#8221; meant &#8220;machismo.&#8221;  (See, for example, Michele Wallace&#8217;s book &#8220;Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman,&#8221; first published around 1979.)</p>
<p>Further, &#8220;machismo&#8221; is not a synonym for &#8220;sexism.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not so sure of all of its connotations in Spanish &#8211; I&#8217;m just now becoming confident enough of my Spanish to begin looking at the literature in that language &#8212; but in English it refers to a particular style of aggressive, impenetrable masculinity.  This style is commonly associated with Latin men, but as I said, we find it in enough gabachos that American English took &#8220;machismo&#8221; as a loan word and applied to American men as well.  So I&#8217;m afraid your impression is mistaken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akacocolopez</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9051</link>
		<dc:creator>akacocolopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9051</guid>
		<description>good take Nia, I never thought of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good take Nia, I never thought of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nia</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9050</link>
		<dc:creator>Nia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9050</guid>
		<description>Maybe my problem is that I&#039;m Spanish and English is not my native language, but I get the impression that English has two synonyms to refer to sex discrimination: &quot;sexism&quot; is universal and &quot;machismo&quot; is what Latinos and sometimes Mediterranean people (ie Italians) do.  I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s the actual use but I find it extremely racist, as if it was implying that &quot;Hispanic and Mediterranean people are so sexist that they need a special word all for them&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe my problem is that I&#8217;m Spanish and English is not my native language, but I get the impression that English has two synonyms to refer to sex discrimination: &#8220;sexism&#8221; is universal and &#8220;machismo&#8221; is what Latinos and sometimes Mediterranean people (ie Italians) do.  I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s the actual use but I find it extremely racist, as if it was implying that &#8220;Hispanic and Mediterranean people are so sexist that they need a special word all for them&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jess</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9049</link>
		<dc:creator>jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9049</guid>
		<description>this is a great article. multiculturalism is good in the abstract, but too often even the purportedly most inclusionary parts of western culture use &quot;awareness&quot; of other cultures as an excuse to continue applying really appalling primitivistic assumptions.

and how demeaning a term is &quot;cultural awareness,&quot; anyway? &quot;oh, dominicans? yes, we&#039;re aware of your people. please read our list of studies in which we have included them.&quot; it&#039;s as though the inclusion of WoC in research is enough to call the research progressive, and blinds so many readers to the actual content and conclusions within.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a great article. multiculturalism is good in the abstract, but too often even the purportedly most inclusionary parts of western culture use &#8220;awareness&#8221; of other cultures as an excuse to continue applying really appalling primitivistic assumptions.</p>
<p>and how demeaning a term is &#8220;cultural awareness,&#8221; anyway? &#8220;oh, dominicans? yes, we&#8217;re aware of your people. please read our list of studies in which we have included them.&#8221; it&#8217;s as though the inclusion of WoC in research is enough to call the research progressive, and blinds so many readers to the actual content and conclusions within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: it&#8217;s a woman&#8217;s world &#171; rising phoenix</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/01/05/sos-different-year/comment-page-1/#comment-9048</link>
		<dc:creator>it&#8217;s a woman&#8217;s world &#171; rising phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.com/?p=565#comment-9048</guid>
		<description>[...] out nojojojo&#8217;s take on this article, from Angry Black [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out nojojojo&#8217;s take on this article, from Angry Black [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

