<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Privilege of Politeness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/</link>
	<description>Race, Politics, Gender, Sexuality, Anger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:29:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4933</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4933</guid>
		<description>IMO what Claire wrote in the first comment adds an important dimension even if I disagree other parts of it.

Naamen wrote in the post:

&lt;blockquote&gt;At the core of this expectation of politeness is the idea that the POC in question should teach the offender what was wrong with their statement. Because in my experience what is meant by “be polite” is “teach me”, teach me why you’re offended by this, teach me how to be racially sensitive and the bottom line is that it is no one’s responsibility to teach anyone else.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And Claire&#039;s first comment included this -- I am only quoting the part that aI feel adds a dimension, and am in no way saying Claire will agree with me on any of this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;... [the] demand for politeness (”well, you could have been nicer about it”) is a weak attempt at saving face and gaining back a little control in a confrontation you are losing, or are about to lose.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I actually agree that the core issue when white people demand politeness and teaching is usually control. And I see the push for control as part of the dynamics of the European cultural system that culturally (and incorrectly) locates white people as superior.

The European cultural ego is motivated by a quest for power and control. Interactions are about maintaining dominance/control.

In this cultural context when white people do this (there are other contexts, but am talking about this one) the culturally specific goal of &quot;saving face&quot; is to protect the association of whiteness and goodness.

I see the &quot;expectation of learning&quot; dynamic as serving this push for control over the communication, and also over the image of self that the person seeks to project.

The reason I feel this as important is because if this is correct, then the actual act of teaching or learning is not the point in these interactions in any way at any time.

Stripped down to the core, the demand to be taught is a demand for submission to the white person&#039;s control in the communication, and also a demand for an acceptance of the &quot;good white&quot; image.

To me this has implications for action. For example: let&#039;s say someone chooses to teach in one of these situations.  If the underlying dynamic is that the white person wants to be in control and maintain the &quot;good white person&quot; image, then there will be no actual learning beyond what can maintain the control (sometimes pretty subtly) and the good person image. The focus is not on learning at all, it is on control and image.

A learner (including one who expects to be treated as a learner) is a different kind of thing to deal with than a white cultural ego interested in control and image. Control and image focus has interaction dangers that learner does not. There will be more subtle violence flowing in the control/image dynamic -- and not by accident but because it is part of the dynamic at its core, because the dynamic itself comes from and perpetuates white supremacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO what Claire wrote in the first comment adds an important dimension even if I disagree other parts of it.</p>
<p>Naamen wrote in the post:</p>
<blockquote><p>At the core of this expectation of politeness is the idea that the POC in question should teach the offender what was wrong with their statement. Because in my experience what is meant by “be polite” is “teach me”, teach me why you’re offended by this, teach me how to be racially sensitive and the bottom line is that it is no one’s responsibility to teach anyone else.</p></blockquote>
<p>And Claire&#8217;s first comment included this &#8212; I am only quoting the part that aI feel adds a dimension, and am in no way saying Claire will agree with me on any of this:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; [the] demand for politeness (”well, you could have been nicer about it”) is a weak attempt at saving face and gaining back a little control in a confrontation you are losing, or are about to lose.</p></blockquote>
<p>I actually agree that the core issue when white people demand politeness and teaching is usually control. And I see the push for control as part of the dynamics of the European cultural system that culturally (and incorrectly) locates white people as superior.</p>
<p>The European cultural ego is motivated by a quest for power and control. Interactions are about maintaining dominance/control.</p>
<p>In this cultural context when white people do this (there are other contexts, but am talking about this one) the culturally specific goal of &#8220;saving face&#8221; is to protect the association of whiteness and goodness.</p>
<p>I see the &#8220;expectation of learning&#8221; dynamic as serving this push for control over the communication, and also over the image of self that the person seeks to project.</p>
<p>The reason I feel this as important is because if this is correct, then the actual act of teaching or learning is not the point in these interactions in any way at any time.</p>
<p>Stripped down to the core, the demand to be taught is a demand for submission to the white person&#8217;s control in the communication, and also a demand for an acceptance of the &#8220;good white&#8221; image.</p>
<p>To me this has implications for action. For example: let&#8217;s say someone chooses to teach in one of these situations.  If the underlying dynamic is that the white person wants to be in control and maintain the &#8220;good white person&#8221; image, then there will be no actual learning beyond what can maintain the control (sometimes pretty subtly) and the good person image. The focus is not on learning at all, it is on control and image.</p>
<p>A learner (including one who expects to be treated as a learner) is a different kind of thing to deal with than a white cultural ego interested in control and image. Control and image focus has interaction dangers that learner does not. There will be more subtle violence flowing in the control/image dynamic &#8212; and not by accident but because it is part of the dynamic at its core, because the dynamic itself comes from and perpetuates white supremacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU.  Beautifully spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU.  Beautifully spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All the RE5 discussion needed was a Nice White Gamer</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All the RE5 discussion needed was a Nice White Gamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>[...] taught the whole &#8220;you&#8217;ll catch more flies with honey than with vinegar&#8221; line, but &#8220;politeness&#8221; isn&#8217;t a neutral concept. Praising someone who said something bigoted for phrasing it and/or the ensuing discussion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taught the whole &#8220;you&#8217;ll catch more flies with honey than with vinegar&#8221; line, but &#8220;politeness&#8221; isn&#8217;t a neutral concept. Praising someone who said something bigoted for phrasing it and/or the ensuing discussion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About the FSF fandom explosion over race &#171; Zero at the Bone</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>About the FSF fandom explosion over race &#171; Zero at the Bone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>[...] The Angry Black Women, Naamen writes The Privilege of Politeness. It&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Angry Black Women, Naamen writes The Privilege of Politeness. It&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naamenblog</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4929</link>
		<dc:creator>Naamenblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>Keliexandra -
I don&#039;t doubt that for some it is.
But why should you be polite or civil to someone who&#039;s just insulted you? who was not polite or civil or intelligent enough to avoid saying something offensive? why do the oppressors or those indoctrinated with their beliefs, consciously or unconsciously, deserve our subservience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keliexandra -<br />
I don&#8217;t doubt that for some it is.<br />
But why should you be polite or civil to someone who&#8217;s just insulted you? who was not polite or civil or intelligent enough to avoid saying something offensive? why do the oppressors or those indoctrinated with their beliefs, consciously or unconsciously, deserve our subservience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keilexandra</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>Keilexandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>I do think it is possible to be simultaneously angry and polite, or at least civil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think it is possible to be simultaneously angry and polite, or at least civil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Privilege of Politeness &#124; illvox: anarchist people of color, race, anarchy, revolution</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4927</link>
		<dc:creator>The Privilege of Politeness &#124; illvox: anarchist people of color, race, anarchy, revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4927</guid>
		<description>[...] Check the full article here: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check the full article here: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What &#8220;x&#8221; said is stupid&#8230; ignorant&#8230; but not racist. &#171; Stuff White People Say</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4926</link>
		<dc:creator>What &#8220;x&#8221; said is stupid&#8230; ignorant&#8230; but not racist. &#171; Stuff White People Say</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4926</guid>
		<description>[...] contrast that to the outside-of-the-job-description responsibilities added on top of POC&#8217;s plate&#8230;  Seriously, think about the &#8220;race relations&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contrast that to the outside-of-the-job-description responsibilities added on top of POC&#8217;s plate&#8230;  Seriously, think about the &#8220;race relations&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Separate But Related Issues, Two Separate But Related Posts #2 at K. Tempest Bradford</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4925</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Separate But Related Issues, Two Separate But Related Posts #2 at K. Tempest Bradford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4925</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;crazy&#8221; things whenever I post about bigotry in the field. Also that if I would just moderate my tone a bit, people would listen to me.  The person in question was white, Ashok is a POC.  So [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;crazy&#8221; things whenever I post about bigotry in the field. Also that if I would just moderate my tone a bit, people would listen to me.  The person in question was white, Ashok is a POC.  So [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/02/12/the-privilege-of-politeness/comment-page-1/#comment-4924</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryblackwoman.wordpress.com/?p=326#comment-4924</guid>
		<description>At the risk of being called &quot;rude&quot;...I&#039;m going to say this loud...

THERE IS NO POLITE WAY TO DISCUSS RACISM IN AMERICA.  IT IS NOT POLITE TO BE A RACIST, NOR IS IT POLITE TO CONTRIBUTE TO RACISM!

Whew!!

I attended a nice little club in Harlem a couple of months ago.  Because this a very popular place, patrons are often asked to share a table.  My two girlfriends and I were having a nice conversation, when along came the hostess, who asked if we&#039;d mind sharing our table, which we didn&#039;t....and seated a white couple at our table.  We exchanged greetings, names, etc...anyway, at this point I was discussing my aunt, who has done very well financially, and her ex husband, who are the very best of friends...a rarity.  One of my friends had traveled with me on a weekend trip to MD, and she met my aunt and her ex...and she&#039;d mentioned that he didn&#039;t look AA (because he is very, very fair...do you know this white dude took that comment as the perfect opportunity to ask why we call ourselves African American, that we&#039;re all Americans, that we shouldn&#039;t hypenate because it  promotes division amongst the races.   My two friends looked dumbfounded; I politely told him it was none of his business what we call ourselves, and politely excused myself, and asked the hostess to ask this clown and his date to leave, lest they&#039;d lose me as a customer.  She did ask them to move, and we were able to continue with our meal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of being called &#8220;rude&#8221;&#8230;I&#8217;m going to say this loud&#8230;</p>
<p>THERE IS NO POLITE WAY TO DISCUSS RACISM IN AMERICA.  IT IS NOT POLITE TO BE A RACIST, NOR IS IT POLITE TO CONTRIBUTE TO RACISM!</p>
<p>Whew!!</p>
<p>I attended a nice little club in Harlem a couple of months ago.  Because this a very popular place, patrons are often asked to share a table.  My two girlfriends and I were having a nice conversation, when along came the hostess, who asked if we&#8217;d mind sharing our table, which we didn&#8217;t&#8230;.and seated a white couple at our table.  We exchanged greetings, names, etc&#8230;anyway, at this point I was discussing my aunt, who has done very well financially, and her ex husband, who are the very best of friends&#8230;a rarity.  One of my friends had traveled with me on a weekend trip to MD, and she met my aunt and her ex&#8230;and she&#8217;d mentioned that he didn&#8217;t look AA (because he is very, very fair&#8230;do you know this white dude took that comment as the perfect opportunity to ask why we call ourselves African American, that we&#8217;re all Americans, that we shouldn&#8217;t hypenate because it  promotes division amongst the races.   My two friends looked dumbfounded; I politely told him it was none of his business what we call ourselves, and politely excused myself, and asked the hostess to ask this clown and his date to leave, lest they&#8217;d lose me as a customer.  She did ask them to move, and we were able to continue with our meal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
